Use when the user asks to create a CodeTour .tour file — persona-targeted, step-by-step walkthroughs that link to real files and line numbers. Trigger for: create a tour, onboarding tour, architecture tour, PR review tour, explain how X works, vibe check, RCA tour, contributor guide, or any structured code walkthrough request.
cd ~/.claude/skills
git clone https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills.git claude-skills mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills/code-tour
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/HEAD/.gemini/skills/code-tour/SKILL.md \
-o ~/.claude/skills/code-tour/SKILL.md Create CodeTour files — persona-targeted, step-by-step walkthroughs of a codebase that link directly to files and line numbers. CodeTour files live in .tours/ and work with the VS Code CodeTour extension.
A great tour is a narrative — a story told to a specific person about what matters, why it matters, and what to do next. Only create .tour JSON files. Never modify source code.
Before asking anything, explore the codebase:
In parallel: list root directory, read README, check config files. Then: identify language(s), framework(s), project purpose. Map folder structure 1-2 levels deep. Find entry points — every path in the tour must be real.
If the repo has fewer than 5 source files, create a quick-depth tour regardless of persona — there’s not enough to warrant a deep one.
One message should be enough. Infer persona, depth, and focus silently.
| User says | Persona | Depth |
|---|---|---|
| ”tour for this PR” | pr-reviewer | standard |
| ”why did X break” / “RCA” | rca-investigator | standard |
| ”onboarding” / “new joiner” | new-joiner | standard |
| ”quick tour” / “vibe check” | vibecoder | quick |
| ”architecture” | architect | deep |
| ”security” / “auth review” | security-reviewer | standard |
| (no qualifier) | new-joiner | standard |
When intent is ambiguous, default to new-joiner persona at standard depth — it’s the most generally useful.
Every file path and line number must be verified. A tour pointing to the wrong line is worse than no tour.
Save to .tours/<persona>-<focus>.tour.
{
"$schema": "https://aka.ms/codetour-schema",
"title": "Descriptive Title — Persona / Goal",
"description": "Who this is for and what they'll understand after.",
"ref": "<current-branch-or-commit>",
"steps": []
}
| Type | When to use | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Content | Intro/closing only (max 2) | { "title": "Welcome", "description": "..." } |
| Directory | Orient to a module | { "directory": "src/services", "title": "..." } |
| File + line | The workhorse | { "file": "src/auth.ts", "line": 42, "title": "..." } |
| Selection | Highlight a code block | { "file": "...", "selection": {...}, "title": "..." } |
| Pattern | Regex match (volatile files) | { "file": "...", "pattern": "class App", "title": "..." } |
| URI | Link to PR, issue, doc | { "uri": "https://...", "title": "..." } |
| Depth | Steps | Use for |
|---|---|---|
| Quick | 5-8 | Vibecoder, fast exploration |
| Standard | 9-13 | Most personas |
| Deep | 14-18 | Architect, RCA |
file path relative to repo root (no leading / or ./)file confirmed to existline verified by reading the filefile or directory anchornextTour matches another tour’s title exactly if set| Persona | Goal | Must cover |
|---|---|---|
| Vibecoder | Get the vibe fast | Entry point, main modules. Max 8 steps. |
| New joiner | Structured ramp-up | Directories, setup, business context |
| Bug fixer | Root cause fast | Trigger -> fault points -> tests |
| RCA investigator | Why did it fail | Causality chain, observability anchors |
| Feature explainer | End-to-end | UI -> API -> backend -> storage |
| PR reviewer | Review correctly | Change story, invariants, risky areas |
| Architect | Shape and rationale | Boundaries, tradeoffs, extension points |
| Security reviewer | Trust boundaries | Auth flow, validation, secret handling |
| Refactorer | Safe restructuring | Seams, hidden deps, extraction order |
| External contributor | Contribute safely | Safe areas, conventions, landmines |
file or directory step (never content-only first step — blank in VS Code)| Anti-pattern | Fix |
|---|---|
| File listing — “this file contains the models” | Tell a story. Each step depends on the previous. |
| Generic descriptions | Name the specific pattern unique to this codebase. |
| Line number guessing | Never write a line you didn’t verify by reading. |
| Too many steps for quick depth | Actually cut steps. |
| Hallucinated files | If it doesn’t exist, skip the step. |
| Recap closing — “we covered X, Y, Z” | Tell the reader what they can now do. |
| Content-only first step | Anchor step 1 to a file or directory. |
engineering/codebase-onboarding — for broader onboarding beyond toursengineering/pr-review-expert — for automated PR review workflowsYou MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - ensures an isolated workspace exists via native tools or git worktree fallback
Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring skill invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions