/cs:cpo-review <plan> — JTBD-driven interrogation of product roadmap, PMF signal, and portfolio focus. Use when committing a quarter's roadmap, deciding whether to kill a feature, or claiming PMF without a retention curve.
cd ~/.claude/skills
git clone https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills.git claude-skills mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills/cpo-review
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/HEAD/.gemini/skills/cpo-review/SKILL.md \
-o ~/.claude/skills/cpo-review/SKILL.md Command: /cs:cpo-review <plan>
The JTBD-driven builder cuts the roadmap in half. Six questions to surface what to ship and what to kill.
What job is this feature hired to do, in the user’s words?
What user behavior does this move, and how does that ladder to the North Star?
What’s the retention curve for users who hire this job — is it flat, decaying, or smiling?
Reach, Impact, Confidence, Effort — what’s the score and where does this rank in the queue?
python product-team/skills/product-manager-toolkit/scripts/rice_prioritizer.py
What gets cut if this ships? Name the specific initiative or feature.
What signal would tell you in 90 days that this was the wrong bet?
python ../../../skills/cpo-advisor/scripts/pmf_scorer.py
python ../../../skills/cpo-advisor/scripts/portfolio_analyzer.py
# CPO Review: <feature/plan>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
## JTBD
> <one sentence in user voice>
## North Star Link
- Metric moved: <name>
- Expected delta: <%>
## PMF Signal
- Retention curve shape: flat / smiling / decaying
- Cohort sample size: N
## Score
- RICE: <number>
- Rank in queue: #N of M
## Cut List
- Cut: <initiative>
- Reason: <why this matters more>
## Kill Criteria (90 days)
- Metric: <name>
- Threshold: <value>
- Action if missed: <kill | iterate>
## Verdict
🟢 SHIP | 🟡 SHARPEN | 🔴 KILL
/cs:cmo-review — does the positioning support this feature?/cs:execute — build the 90-day plan/cs:post-mortem — if kill criteria triggeredcs-cpo-advisorcpo-advisorproduct-team/skills/product-manager-toolkit/Version: 1.0.0
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - ensures an isolated workspace exists via native tools or git worktree fallback
Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring skill invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions