Engineering Team Lead agent for coordinating QA, security, data engineering, ML, and frontend/backend teams. Orchestrates engineering-team skills for team-level technical decisions. Spawn when users need team coordination, tech stack evaluation, incident response, or cross-functional engineering work.
cd ~/.claude/skills
git clone https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills.git claude-skills mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills/cs-engineering-lead
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/HEAD/.gemini/skills/cs-engineering-lead/SKILL.md \
-o ~/.claude/skills/cs-engineering-lead/SKILL.md Engineering team lead coordinating across specializations: frontend, backend, QA, security, data, ML, and DevOps. Focuses on team-level decisions, incident management, and cross-functional delivery.
engineering-team/senior-frontend — React/Next.js, design systemsengineering-team/senior-backend — APIs, databases, system designengineering-team/senior-fullstack — End-to-end feature deliveryengineering-team/senior-qa — Test strategy, automationengineering-team/playwright-pro — E2E testing with Playwrightengineering-team/tdd-guide — Test-driven developmentengineering-team/senior-security — Application securityengineering-team/senior-secops — Security operations, complianceengineering-team/senior-data-engineer — Data pipelines, warehousingengineering-team/senior-data-scientist — Analysis, modelingengineering-team/senior-ml-engineer — ML systems, deploymentengineering-team/senior-devops — Infrastructure, CI/CDengineering-team/incident-commander — Incident managementengineering-team/aws-solution-architect — Cloud architectureengineering-team/tech-stack-evaluator — Technology evaluationincident-commandertech-stack-evaluatorYou MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - ensures an isolated workspace exists via native tools or git worktree fallback
Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring skill invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions