/cs:gc-review <plan> — General Counsel interrogation of contracts, IP, regulatory, term sheets, and employment-law surface. Use when reviewing a term sheet before signing, redlining a customer MSA, or checking IP assignment and regulatory exposure on a new product.
cd ~/.claude/skills
git clone https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills.git claude-skills mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills/gc-review
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/HEAD/.gemini/skills/gc-review/SKILL.md \
-o ~/.claude/skills/gc-review/SKILL.md Command: /cs:gc-review <plan>
The General Counsel lens. Six questions before any contract, term sheet, IP move, or regulatory commitment. This is a lane gstack has zero of — and one where a single missed clause costs more than a year of engineering.
⚠️ Not legal advice. This command surfaces the right questions to ask before talking to outside counsel. Always engage qualified counsel for binding decisions.
Who owns the IP being created or shared in this transaction?
What’s the liability cap, and what’s carved out from it?
What personal data is involved, and is a DPA in place?
What’s the termination right, what’s the notice period, and what’s auto-renew?
Does this expose the company to a new regulatory regime?
If this is a hire or contractor: jurisdiction, classification, equity grant, IP assignment?
# GC Review: <plan>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
## Document
- Type: <contract / term sheet / grant / DPA>
- Counterparty: <name>
- $ value or scope: <amount>
## Issues
| # | Issue | Risk | Recommendation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | <e.g., uncapped IP indemnity> | HIGH | Cap at fees paid, mutual |
| 2 | <e.g., 5-year auto-renew> | MED | 1-year max, 60-day notice |
| 3 | <e.g., no DPA, EU data> | HIGH | Require DPA before sign |
## Regulatory Trigger
- New regime triggered? <yes/no>
- Specific frameworks: <HIPAA / GDPR / etc.>
## Outside Counsel Action Items
- [ ] <specific item 1>
- [ ] <specific item 2>
- [ ] <specific item 3>
## Verdict
🟢 SIGN AS-IS (rare)
🟡 NEGOTIATE — counter on top-3 issues
🔴 DO NOT SIGN — material risk
/cs:ciso-review — for any data-touching contract/cs:cfo-review — for any commitment > 1 year or > 1% of revenue/cs:decide — log the verdict after outside counsel reviewgeneral-counsel-advisor skillSince v2.5.1, this command is backed by a full skill at ../../../skills/general-counsel-advisor/ with two Python tools:
# Automated contract scan (12 founder-killer patterns)
python ../../../skills/general-counsel-advisor/scripts/contract_risk_scanner.py path/to/contract.txt
# Term sheet scoring (0-100 founder-friendliness)
python ../../../skills/general-counsel-advisor/scripts/term_sheet_analyzer.py path/to/term_sheet.json
The cs-general-counsel-advisor agent orchestrates both tools plus 3 references (contracts playbook, IP + regulatory, term sheet decoder).
general-counsel-advisor — full skill with Python tools + referencescs-general-counsel-advisor../../../../ra-qm-team/../../../skills/ma-playbook/Version: 1.0.0
Use when facing 2+ independent tasks that can be worked on without shared state or sequential dependencies
Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
Use when executing implementation plans with independent tasks in the current session
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
Use when implementing any feature or bugfix, before writing implementation code
Use when creating new skills, editing existing skills, or verifying skills work before deployment