/cs:cto-review <plan> — Architecture and scaling interrogation. Tech debt, scaling cliffs, team scaling, build-vs-buy. Use when committing to an architecture, planning for 10x load, or weighing a rebuild against a vendor.
cd ~/.claude/skills
git clone https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills.git claude-skills mkdir -p ~/.claude/skills/cto-review
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/HEAD/.gemini/skills/cto-review/SKILL.md \
-o ~/.claude/skills/cto-review/SKILL.md Command: /cs:cto-review <plan>
Pressure-tests architecture and engineering scaling decisions. Six questions to surface the next scaling cliff before you hit it.
Where does the current architecture break, in terms of users / requests / data volume?
What’s the top tech debt item, what’s it costing per week, and when does it become blocking?
python ../../../skills/cto-advisor/scripts/tech_debt_analyzer.py
For each open req, what’s the ramp time and contribution model?
python ../../../skills/cto-advisor/scripts/team_scaling_calculator.py
Why are we building this instead of buying it — and what’s the 3-year TCO of each?
What are the SLOs for this system and what’s the current error budget burn?
engineering/slo-architect for SLO design.What does this expose, and has cs-ciso-advisor signed off?
# CTO Review: <plan>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
## Scaling Cliff
- Current capacity: <metric>
- Break point: <metric>
- Headroom: X months at current growth
## Tech Debt
- Top item: <description>
- Cost per week: $X or N eng-hours
- Blocking date estimate: <date>
## Team
- Open reqs: N
- Median ramp: X months
- Contribution model: <pairing / squad / area>
## Build vs Buy
- 3-year build TCO: $X
- 3-year buy TCO: $X
- Strategic fit: <core / context>
- Decision: BUILD | BUY
## Reliability
- SLO defined: yes / no
- Error budget burn: X% (target < Y%)
## Security
- cs-ciso sign-off: ✅ / ❌
## Verdict
🟢 SHIP | 🟡 SHARPEN | 🔴 BLOCK
## Next Steps
[3 concrete actions]
/cs:ciso-review — mandatory if data surface changes/cs:cfo-review — for build-vs-buy > $100K/cs:execute — quarterly plan/cs:boardroom — for architecture pivotscs-cto-advisorcto-advisor../../../../engineering/slo-architect/Version: 1.0.0
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements
Use when starting feature work that needs isolation from current workspace or before executing implementation plans - ensures an isolated workspace exists via native tools or git worktree fallback
Use when starting any conversation - establishes how to find and use skills, requiring skill invocation before ANY response including clarifying questions